The use of composite columns is increasing in many instrumental devices around the world due to the co-operation of concrete and steel structures. Compound columns not only have many advantages in manufacturing, but also significantly improve the mechanical properties of the members of the device compared to the reinforced concrete and steel members, including increased enclosure, increased shear strength and, consequently, increased member efficiency. The compound column is made up of different sections, hence the structural variation. In this paper, three specific types of CFT, SRC, and SRC reinforced column FRP columns are investigated and with the help of ABAQUS finite element software, these columns are modeled and subjected to cyclic loading, and their energy absorption and hysteresis charts are compared and their advantages and disadvantages are specified. Is. Then, the structure behavior is compared with each other and it has been shown that the reinforced columns with frp have improved their behavior. Structural elasticity with FRP coatings has improved dramatically from 96/96 to 2.5. Using FRP coatings, the points are surrendered and the surrendered elements are reduced and the structure will withstand more force and show better behavior against the earthquake.